The Bloomington city council members who were sworn in on Jan. 1 have a chance to chart a course for transparency that could distinguish them from the group who were sworn in four years ago.
If the 2024 edition of the city council managed to get through the first two days of the year without violating Indiana’s Open Door Law, then they have already improved on the previous group’s performance.
But there’s more to transparency than just resisting any urge to meet outside of public view to discuss the people’s business.
Transparency is about a cultural norm—an expectation that any information accessible to councilmembers is also accessible to the public.
Ideally, the public should not have to ask to see the same information that is provided to councilmembers. That information should be pushed to the public, by posting it on the city’s website.
But when a member of the public does ask to see the same information that has been provided to councilmembers, it should be provided without delay and without redaction.
The Bloomington city council that was sworn into office in 2020 fell dramatically short of that basic cultural norm of transparency.
The new city council could make a good start towards establishing better cultural norms, by directing the council staff to start posting, a matter of routine, one category of document that has previously been shielded from public view—meeting memos.
A “meeting memo” is a memo composed by council staff and sent to councilmembers on the day of a meeting. Such memos could, as a matter of standard procedure, be posted in the same place on the website as a meeting information packet. Continue reading “Column: Will Bloomington’s new city council continue a culture of secrecy or chart a different course?”